From: "Mark" 


"Rich Gauszka"  wrote in
message news:45e24fbf$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> How about E: Diplomacy - It's not instantaneous but your C alternative
> will just create millions of fanatics.

Oh you're playing that old canard that defending our ideals creates
fanatics? Even if that were true, tough shit for them -- they're on the
wrong side of right.

>>How well are we doing in Iraq?

We're doing pretty damn well in Iraq, a helluva a lot better than the
surrender monkeys on the D side (and a few fools on the R side) of congress
will ever see or acknowledge due to their shameless political posturing for
their own MSM driven personal benefit vs. the well-being of our country,
the world, and that of the future well-being of the Iraqi people in
particular; the middle-east in general.

> Well it would be a promotional opportunity for some General vacancies.

> http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/iraq/article1434540.ece
>
> There are four or five generals and admirals we know of who would resign
> if Bush ordered an attack on Iran,” a source with close ties to British
> intelligence said. ...

Wow, some Brits say, in so many words that: Bush sucks, America is wrong,
Generals (five of them of even!!!!) want to surrender -- What a
revelation!!! Pfft.

And you buy into, as well as propagate that bullshit Rich?  

Next you'll be telling me to read Sy Hersh's latest fiction.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5