From: Rich Gauszka 

How about E: Diplomacy - It's not instantaneous but your C alternative will
just create millions of fanatics. How well are we doing in Iraq?

Well it would be a promotional opportunity for some General vacancies.


http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/iraq/article1434540.ece

There are four or five generals and admirals we know of who would resign if
Bush ordered an attack on Iran,” a source with close ties to British
intelligence said. “There is simply no stomach for it in the Pentagon, and
a lot of people question whether such an attack would be effective or even
possible.”

A British defence source confirmed that there were deep misgivings inside
the Pentagon about a military strike. “All the generals are perfectly clear
that they don’t have the military capacity to take Iran on in any
meaningful fashion. Nobody wants to do it and it would be a matter of
conscience for them.


Mark wrote:
> I'll mark you down for D) then Rich.
>
> "Rich Gauszka"  wrote in message
> news:45e24cb5$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> Mark wrote:
>>> "Adam"
<""4thwormcastfromthemolehill\"{at}the field.near the
bridge"> wrote
>>> ... Attain orbit & you're capable of dropped things from
orbit anywhere
>>> on earth. I wonder if they will sell/help with NK'es
"satellite launching
>>> capabilities"?
>>>
>>> So Adam, do you think we should:
>>>
>>> A) Sit back and let them continue on their path?
>>>
>>> B) Help them attain nuclear weapons sooner, by continuing to diddle
>>> around with the UN while protesting loudly and banging Birkenstocks on
>>> tables?
>>>
>>> C) Take out their capabilities before they get farther along?
>>>
>>> D) Dismantle all of our defense systems and buy prayer rugs
and compasses
>>> to find the direction to Mecca efficiently and ahead of their schedule?
>>> 
>>>
>>> My choice? C) of course, but then I don't do the
socialism/islamo fascism
>>> submission thing very well.
>>>
>>>
>> but you are doing the war mongering fascist quite well
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5