From: "Mark" 


"Rich Gauszka"  wrote in
message news:45e7901e$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> FWIW - I don't disagree with what you've stated below. Where we differ is
> in how we define what is  'unproven science'.

Thanks Rich. I don't mean to come across as stridently as I sometimes do,
but I guess I get carried away from time to time because I worry about the
consequences of doing too much, too soon, based on what I believe to be
less than solid science. We'll likely never come to agreement on that point
in the present 

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5