On 10/01/2021 04:09, Richard Falken wrote:
> If I may step in...
>
> last time I talked to a lab person with experience in the vaccine market, he
> told me that using a big number of subjects alone does not count as good
> testing.
>
> If I develop a med that causes you to grow a second head the 18th month after
> the first administration, the fact I tested the med in a million subjects
won't
> help the least if the testing was conducted for less than 18 months.
Indeed, but what the testing has done is ascertain that the vaccines are
(a) moderately effective and (b) not instantly lethal

I was offered adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy  "Radiotherapy will
give a 15% increase in  the risk of possible unrelated cancers after
about 15 years"

"What about the chemotherapy"
"Well that's only been around for 12 years actually so we don't know"

"But the 5 year survival rate since that chemo was introduced went from
around 70% to 98%.."

Life is risky


--
Gun Control: The law that ensures that only criminals have guns.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05