RF> Zombies aren't plausible!  If you're going to make a game with
 RF> zombies, you don't say that science was responsible for them. They
 RF> should be brought about with a mystical rite or some such thing.
 SI>        Once, again.  You didn't play the full version.  
 SI> Who ever said they 
 SI> were zomies?  The game never called them that.  Game 
 SI> mags called them zombies 
 SI> because they looked like it.
        People affected with a virus don't behave that way.
 SI>        Do you think Mario is plausible?  How bout Crash or Sonic?  Or 
any 
        Well, no.  But even if I did play one of those games, they would 
still be more coherent.
        The problem with RE is that it sets its story in the real world, and 
uses a real-world problem (viruses) to explain the existence of the 
"zombies." It's totally illogical - the closest viruses come to creating 
these creatures are hemorraging.
 SI> game?  If games were realistic (I mean things did and can happen) than 
it 
 SI> would be a simulation not a game.  Sure the idea of
        Simulations can still be games.  Never played AH-64D Longbow, or 
NASCAR Racing 2?
        BTW, there *are* realistic games, such as Sierra's Police Quest 
series, Sid Meier's Civilization games, etc...
 SI> "zombies" is unrealistic, 
 SI> but it's a game.
 SI>        I still stick with my opion.  The plot is really 
 SI> well done.  Resident 
 SI> Evil got me into game stories.  That's something that 
 SI> lacks on the N64.  I 
 SI> haven't played Saturn lately, so I can't really comment. 
        Have you *ever* read a novel?  Resident Evil's story is horrible in 
comparison.  For a real story, play a Gabriel Knight game.
 
--- Maximus 3.01
---------------