[...]
 > just remember you may be the advocate, but I am the devil himself
 > ...
OK, if you insist.
 >>     Disclaimers, now you sound like a marketing firm  Jack.  Well, we
 >> all speculate as to purpose, what  is genuine,  what is  hoax, and of
 >> course  from  where  etc  etc..   You  and I  both know  that the UFO
 >> community has no physical, undeniable proof.  Only circumstantial.
 >> But we  certainly  have a  lot of  circumstantial.  Piles  of data.
 >> But I understand where you are coming from.
 >  JS> Well then, stop complaining! I have the skeptic community to contend
 >  JS> with whenever I forget to announce my intentions.
 >     The skeptic community  Ho Ho!  Ah,  are we  walking on  rice
 > paper
 > lately .  Well, "announce my intentions"?   What are  you
 > doing?
 > Planning to marry a skeptic? ...
I did.  ...Back in 1953. ...The same year of my sighting.
 >  JS> You should know me well enough by now that I am sympathetic to the
 >  JS> cause, but how much can I assume from a sighting I had years ago? The
 >  JS> word alien is too much of a leap for me to make.
 >     Well,  I  assume nothing,  but like  it or  not Jack,  the
 > subject
 > really is, was that a genuine alien, or not.  That is what  the
 > object
 > of this exercise is,  to determine  once and  for all  within
 > whatever
 > time frame it takes, are we the subject of alien intrusion, and  if
 > it
 > comes to pass that proof finally comes out, then anything
 > goes........
Many, if not most, would settle for just the answers. Whether or not
some are hoping for aliens is another matter.
Regards,
Jack
--- FMail 1.22
---------------