Hyerdahl wrote:
> Ian wrote:
>
>>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4305047.stm
>>
>>Complete heroes the lot of them.
>
>
> Nah...they're just pissed about paying CS.  How have their endeavors
> helped any children?
>
>>Does anybody notice the interesting detail... For the first time I've
>
> noticed, they have specifically pointed out who
>
>>is to blame. "Access denied. Don't let _Labour_ stop you being a
>
> Superdad".
>
> The only time "access" is denied is when fathers are abusive or
> neglectful, eh?  So are you complaining that neglectful fathers have
> access denied?
>

This is typical female logic. Start from the
establishment assumption and argue from there.
How is this idot female allowed on the group?

Dustbin

>
>>Not that the Tories helped, but it's Tony Bliar the cunt who has made
>
> it a whole lot worse for men, and by cause and effect, for children
> too, and by effect the women of tomorrow's generation.
>
> The women of "tomorrow's generation" are already learning that mothers
> tend to stay with kids and that fathers are often neglectful.  What
> else would you have them learn?  BTW, what makes you think that the
> women seduced by Bond owed him anything at all?  You bitter boys are
> all alike in expecting women to babysit your sperm and tell you about
> it's behavior. Growup and control your OWN sperm.
>

This bitch is a fine example of why wimmin get a
smack in the gob. She has the most miniscule
mind that seems only capable of accusing
everyone who says something she doesn't like of
being a bitter boy.

Moore (1908) again, again, again.

Dustbin.


--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 2/28/05 9:34:32 PM ---