Andy Burns wrote:
> then use css to modify the styles depending on whether their
> states are checked or not.

CSS is strictly for design not content. If suppressing CSS (for whatever
reason, sensible or not) loses content it's stricly wrong. Highlighting
content and making it more visible is another thing, but checked vs.
unchecked *must* be discernible to everybody under all circumstances.

I routinely suppress colours and backgrounds -- most sites become so
much more easily legible and no longer hide the distinction between
visited/unvisited links from me (not to mention links at all - most uses
are not meant to be but are similar to games where you have click
arbitrary items to find the hidden door) but in some very bad ones I
lose important content that way.

This is neither taste nor choice, it's simply wrong.


--
/¯\   No  |    Dipl.-Ing. F. Axel Berger    Tel: +49/ 221/ 7771 8067
\ /  HTML |    Roald-Amundsen-Straße 2a     Fax: +49/ 221/ 7771 8069
 X    in  |    D-50829 Köln-Ossendorf      http://berger-odenthal.de
/ \  Mail | -- No unannounced, large, binary attachments, please! --

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05