Hello John,

 LL>>>> Should welfare recipients be sterilized as a condition to
 LL>>>> remain on welfare?

 JM>>> No;

 LL>> David Duke thought it was good idea.  Many other Americans agreed
 LL>> with him, electing him (as a Republican) to Congress.  He then went
 LL>> on to make the runoff for governor of Louisiana, but was easily
 LL>> defeated by (Democrat) Edwin Edwards, who made race and welfare a
 LL>> major part of his campaign.  :)

 JM> That is true. But has nothing to do with me. Why bring it up?

David Duke is a Republican.  David Duke won election to Congress
as a Republican.  David Duke claims his ideas represent the ideas
of all Republicans, and that his ideas are the basic foundation
of the Republican Party (as it exists today).

In order to repudiate David Duke, you would have to also repudiate
the Republican Party.  Are you willing to do that?

 JM>> But They should not be given one more penny IF they have
JM>a child AFTER
 JM> they are already on welfare.

 LL>> I don't see why not.

 JM> I know you don't.

There are planned, and unplanned, pregnancies.
There are wanted, and unwanted, babies.

Those who claim to be pro-life say that abortion
is murder, while also at the same time being in favor
of the death penalty for inmates on life row.

Who has the right to play God?  Does anybody have
the right to tell a woman she has to get rid of her
own unborn child because society refuses to pay for
what society says is a mistake?

Why do rich folks get a pass while poor folks
always get the blame?  Guess who gets the most
abortions in America?  Oh, but those little
morning after pills rich folks buy at the corner
drug store don't count.  And all them rich folks
on life row?  There are none.  Lots of black
folk.  But no rich folk.

 JM> I also know it is pointless to try and discuss it with you.

Lemme see if I got this right.

You are against welfare.

That being the case -

What are you for?

--Lee

--- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb