Greetings mark!

 ml>  On Thu, 04 Sep 2014, Roy Witt wrote to mark lewis:

 ml>> not mine nor that of the LS_ARRL echo...

 RW>> Then keep the subject there and not here.

 ml> /i/ didn't bring it up...

Neither did I...

 ml> my first post was the *3rd* in the thread and that only due to your
 ml> question which appeared to be denigrating the LS_ARRL posting of the
 ml> ARNewsletter

It must be a horrible position to be in, that is, the lack of English
reading comprehension.

If I appeared to be denigrating the LS-ARRL echo, there is more to be said
than a slight denigration of the echo. More specifically the echo
moderator.

If you find anything in #2, more specifically; "blatant profanity, flames,
insults or slander" in that post, feel free to complain to the moderator
as stated in #9, paragraph 4...Otherwise you're in violation of #3.

 ml> contrary to the posted HAM Rule #2 - Decorum... if you hadn't said
 ml> what you said the way you said it, this wouldn't have even seen the
 ml> 4th post...

I find it astonishingly stupid for a non-licensed person to be operating
an echo pertaining to Amateur Radio. To top it off, I find it blatantly
stupid to post the ARNewsletter in a supposedly ARRL dedicated echo, when
the two entities aren't even in the same bed with each other. Being a AR
licensed ham, you would know that. But, alas you're not.

PS, it is startling to see a capitol letter in your text above.


    Have a day!

         R\%/itt - K5RXT


... Don't be calm and carry on, put on your boots and kick ass!

--- GoldED+/W32 1.1.5-31012
--- D'Bridge 3.99