"John W Edser"  wrote in message
news:...
> "Jim McGinn"  wrote
> 
> > JMcG:-
> > Do you have any empirical (evidence based) objections to the
> > replacement of absolutistic assumptions with relativistic assumptions?
> 
> JE:-
> 
> I repeat:
> 
> If A varies with B
> 
> Then:
> 
> A = kB
> 
> If k is also just a variable then A and B can
> be anything so nothing has been suggested
> that is testable. If k is an absolute
> assumption, i.e. a constant, then A and B
> becomes relative to it, ALONE, and thus
> cannot just be anything.  Now the view has
> a possibility of being testable.
> 
> John Edser
> Independent Researcher
> 
> PO Box 266
> Church Pt
> NSW 2105
> Australia
> 
> edser{at}ozemail.com.au

All you are saying here is that in order to test something you have to
be able to measure the variables thereof and in order to do this we
need units of measure.  I don't disagree.  Nobody disagrees.

Now how's about answering the question I asked above.

Jim
---
þ RIMEGate(tm)/RGXPost V1.14 at BBSWORLD * Info{at}bbsworld.com

---
 * RIMEGate(tm)V10.2áÿ* RelayNet(tm) NNTP Gateway * MoonDog BBS
 * RgateImp.MoonDog.BBS at 10/29/02 10:27:33 AM