Hyerdahl wrote:
>
> This is not a new proclaimation, nor is it untrue.  There are men in
> every country who want women bound in some fashion either by using
> direct and indirect discrimination against them.  As to respect, I
> don't know of any point in time when men gave respect to women the
same
> way the give and receive it themselves.  However, women today are
> seeking respect from other women and don't seem to care as much about
> what men choose to respect.

Women live longer yet achieve less. Hardly respectful, eh?

> I agree with you in that American women are more powerful than women
in
> third world nations.  :-)  But then, so are men.  :-)

Womens "power" is pulling the strings of the puppets of patriarchy.

> Men could easily do that if they made better health and risk choices.
> They simply don't.

Dildo hyerdahl can't see then why men achieve more in less time.

> No they don't.  They were tracking the widows of dead men.  :-)
> and make up 55% of current college graduates.
> Yes, that is true.

And I tell you, the infotech revolution was fostered by men who dropped
out of college. ;-)

> As there is no equal female representation, they are indeed excluded
in
> that representation.  Until women have equal rep.they will be>
underepreseted.

Women EXCLUDE themselves from the hard yakka of building and
contructing civilisation. That is SELF EXCLUSION.

> They only win when they are primary caregivers which the couple
> themselves put into action.  When men are primary caregivers, they
win
> just as often or more.

He must work, she has the choice of : part time, full time work, work,
work. "Hon, you can stay home while I work the mines" ;-[)

> Work related fatalities fail to include the home, where many women
> work.  And we all know that most accidents happen ...at home.

YEah, well show me the crushed limbs of women "working" at home, show
me the decapitation of worksite women in the home. Sexist self
preserving gals.

> Women don't perpetrate that violence and we protect the Amish before
we
> protect two gang bangers.  :-)

Again, if men have all the power, why are so many jailed? Clearly, it
is womens hand of sexism that harms men.

> It's perfectly ok to be preferential to groups NOT causing the
> violence.  Society has done that throughout history.

No its not when lesser qualified women get a job aheadjob of better
qualified white males. ;-)

> Health funding by private organizations can be spent on whatever
those
> organizations wish to fund.

Idiot Hyerdahl forgets the massive government social system primarily
caters for womens and childrens hospitals. Where's the patriachal
hospitals for men again? 

> People CHOOSE the work they do.  Stop blaming women for men making
poor
> choices.  AND, since men are more violent in every other way, why
would
> you think they would be less violent in how they attempt suicide?

Women EXCLUDE themselves from work. Stop blaming men for sexist women
making the choice of being self preserving sexists and looosing in the
process.

> Warren Farrell is that dude accused of talking about the "positive
> effects of incest" between adults and children, no?

Yeah, I bet that you screwed his words.

> No one ever said that, nor need feminists make that point in order to
> demand equal rights, equal treatment and equal opportunity.
Feminists
> know that selfish men will be selfish whether or not women label
them.
> :-)  AND, women are now in a position to be concerned over their own
> rights, and don't need sexist men to be concerned at all.

Women are self preserving sexists and that is why they achieve less;
its that simple, simpleton.

> Again, how equal is too equal.  Women have indeed seized the day, by
> their bloodless coup de grace.  :-)  They have secured equal rights
at
> law, here in the west, and are now all about enforcing it, which is
why
> bitter boys like you are yowling.

Equal is equal when sexist women share the everday burdens in life and
lifestyle depriving jobs.

Get to it, bitter gal!



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/3/05 8:57:35 PM ---