On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 05:58:08 GMT, Mz. Rikki 
wrote:

>On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 13:55:39 GMT, "~krp~" 
>wrote:
>
>>
>> wrote in message
>>news:kcr7211dohr4v36liodtobussj8m20u9fo{at}4ax.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>This guy obviously made his "deposite" in a
manner which he considered
>>>>>safe and was deceived by a manipulative bitch! No other
way to look at
>>>>>it!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>You have zero proof of that claim. None at all.
>>>
>>> What do you mean. Go back and read the ENTIRE story this time Honey.
>>> He came in her mouth. Now last time I checked you can't get pregnant
>>> swallowing.
>>>
>>> He had every expectation that he had avoided getting her pregnant!
>>
>>
>>WRONG! He ejaculated into a condom. Some of the times their
"sex" was oral
>>and others manual. But it was ALWAYS with a condom. He threw the condom
>>away, she retrieved it and used it. The essential facts of how she became
>>pregnant are not in dispute.
>>
>
>There is no way to know if the condom was defective or not.
>
>The story this man made up about throwing the condom away is
>irrelevant anyway.
>
>He had sex with a women and the birth control method failed. Now he
>wants to walk away from the women and his child.
>
>That's just wrong!

Tell me My Dear..... Did you support President Clinton in his
Presidency?

If you did then you cannot believe that there is any pregnancy that
this man could be guilty of.




--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/4/05 12:57:35 AM ---