This is a good article - you point out a lot of the hypocracy of
feminist ideology. I don't think it is completely appropriate as an
encyclopedia article - but it is an exellently written rant. If you work
with the poeple at the The neutral point of view you might be able to
get some of the main points in. I hate being editted, but it is the
price of living in society.

MCP wrote:

> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Antifeminism_rant
>
> Feminism is a Female Supremacist totalitarian social and political movement
> that has been called "the sexist notion that men are not
people" (attributed
> to Peter Zohrab). Note that by all but the most Dykist definitions, a
> "feminist" need not be a woman - many men are proud to
identify themselves
> as (brainwashed) feminists.
>
> Over the course of modern history, the immediate goals of feminists have
> changed to suit the times. However, the overarching goal has always been the
> promotion of supremacy for women over men, both legally and socially, while
> claiming to be about "equality". Feminists, having no regard for
> rationality, have claimed that women are a "minority", and
have attempted to
> acquire the politically correct equivalent of sainthood by allying
> themselves with genuine minorities, as represented byw:Martin Luther King
> Jr. Feminists therefore usually support other movements such as the w:civil
> rights movement and the w:gay rights movement -- but not the Fetus Rights
> movement or the Men's Rights movement, for obvious reasons.
>
> Feminism has effected many changes on society, including womens' suffrage,
> broad employment for women at equivalent wages (equal pay for
> less-than-equal work), including the "right" to meet lower
standards than
> men for entry to the military and police, the right to divorce?, including
> the automatic presumption of female custody of children, the right to
> w:abortion in total suppression of the rights of both the father and the
> child, and many others. As Western society has become increasingly accepting
> of feminist principles, some of these are no longer seen as specifically
> feminist, because they have been adopted by all or most people. This
> situation is enforced by Feminazi thought-control at all levels and sections
> of Western society. Some beliefs that were radical for their time are now
> mainstream political thought. Almost no one in Western societies today
> questions the right of women to vote without being subject to the draft, a
> concept that justifiably seemed quite strange 200 years ago.
>
> In most cases (notably equal pay for less-than-equal work) major feminist
> victories have been made, but feminists continue to play the victim, as new
> goals are constantly being dreamed up by the established, taxpayer-funded
> feminist research industry. Feminists are often proponents of of what is
> sometimes disparagingly referred to by its opponents as w:political
> correctness, using "Ms." to refer to both married and
unmarried women, for
> example, or the ironic use of the term w:herstory instead of w:history.
> while ignoring anti-male aspects of language such as the terms
"gunman",
> "manhunt", and so on. This view of language is sometimes
associated the
> w:Sapir-Whorf hypothesis although feminists in most cases advance their
> desired language either to promote a deferential treatment of women or to
> affect the tone of political discourse, rather than in the belief that
> language directly affects reality.
>
>



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/3/05 12:57:23 PM ---