TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: aust_modem
to: David Drummond
from: Robert Gorey
date: 1996-05-17 06:55:32
subject: `UNABLE TO TRAIN` FAX PROBLE

-=> Quoting David Drummond to Robert Gorey <=-

 DD> Robert, at 15:15 on Apr 23 1996, you wrote to Sunny Leung ...
 
 SL>> From what I read in other echos there's a difference 
 SL>> between 2 and 2.0 when faxing is concerned.
 RG> I don't know of any fax software that supports Class 2.0 :-(
 
 RG> I have Winfax 7 (for Win95) and Procomm Plus 3.0 (has fax
 RG> capability) and both will recognise my modem (Courier
 RG> v.everything) as being suitable for  Class 1 only.
 
 RG> Why does USR support class 2.0 when all the fax software 
 RG> vendors and every other modem that I know of supports Class 2 
 RG> only?

 DD> I am led to believe that 2.0 is the ITU-T ratified standard.


 I believe you are right but that leaves the question which has
 me stumped viz. Why if class 2.0 is the ratified standard do most
 modems and "all" (as far as I know) software support class
 2? 

 Rob


---
* Origin: Melbourne PC User Group +61-3-9699-6788 (3:632/309)
SEEN-BY: 3/103 50/99 620/243 621/525 623/630 624/300 625/100 632/50 107 108
SEEN-BY: 632/111 309 329 348 353 360 371 525 530 535 561 562 633/371 634/388
SEEN-BY: 634/396 635/301 402 502 503 506 541 544 639/252 711/401 409 410 413
SEEN-BY: 711/430 808 809 899 932 934 712/515 713/888 714/906 800/1
@PATH: 632/309 107 635/503 50/99 711/808 934

SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.