| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | `UNABLE TO TRAIN` FAX PROBLE |
-=> Quoting David Drummond to Robert Gorey <=- DD> Robert, at 15:15 on Apr 23 1996, you wrote to Sunny Leung ... SL>> From what I read in other echos there's a difference SL>> between 2 and 2.0 when faxing is concerned. RG> I don't know of any fax software that supports Class 2.0 :-( RG> I have Winfax 7 (for Win95) and Procomm Plus 3.0 (has fax RG> capability) and both will recognise my modem (Courier RG> v.everything) as being suitable for Class 1 only. RG> Why does USR support class 2.0 when all the fax software RG> vendors and every other modem that I know of supports Class 2 RG> only? DD> I am led to believe that 2.0 is the ITU-T ratified standard. I believe you are right but that leaves the question which has me stumped viz. Why if class 2.0 is the ratified standard do most modems and "all" (as far as I know) software support class 2? Rob ---* Origin: Melbourne PC User Group +61-3-9699-6788 (3:632/309) SEEN-BY: 3/103 50/99 620/243 621/525 623/630 624/300 625/100 632/50 107 108 SEEN-BY: 632/111 309 329 348 353 360 371 525 530 535 561 562 633/371 634/388 SEEN-BY: 634/396 635/301 402 502 503 506 541 544 639/252 711/401 409 410 413 SEEN-BY: 711/430 808 809 899 932 934 712/515 713/888 714/906 800/1 @PATH: 632/309 107 635/503 50/99 711/808 934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.