From: No One 

"John D.Wentzky"  writes:

> "thomas p."  wrote in message
> news:1174542611.921031.259270{at}l75g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> > On 21 Mar., 18:23, "John D.Wentzky"

> > wrote:
>
> > And your point would be?  Nobody argued that they agreed with every
> > decision the court makes, only that the court has the right to
> > determine the constitutionality of laws in cases brought before it.
>
> They can only determine something to be unconstitutional if it
> violates the Constitution.  Check the Separation of powers
> requirement that was violated by the USSC in 1973 in roevwade.

"Separation of powers" does not mean "Wentzky agrees with
the decision."

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag