On 4 Mar 2005 03:34:38 -0800, "ddnoe{at}bellsouth.net"
 wrote:

>Grizzlie Antagonist wrote:
>> On 3 Mar 2005 04:50:56 -0800, "ddnoe{at}bellsouth.net"
>>  wrote:
>>
>> >I've got a review up at http://www.domsview.com/Vol6/I2/review2.htm
>> >about the made-for-TV movie, "The Man in the Attic,"
starring Neil
>> >Patrick Harris, Anne Archer, and Len Cariou.  The film tells the
>story
>> >of a dominant woman and a submissive man as does my Crime Library
>> >article on the case that inspired it.
>> >    Note to Grizzlie and Society: as you know, I have written about
>the
>> >opposite sort of relationship in the past as in my essay on "Women
>> >Filmmakers for Women's Submission."  I intend to write about male
>> >dominant-female submissive relationships in the future, especially
>as
>> >depicted in the popular media.
>>
>>
>> I appreciate the update, Denise, as I am always attempting to keep
>> track of your every move - to the exclusion of everything else.
>
>(Denise) I'm sorry, Grizzlie, if it sounded like that. : /  


It's all right, Denise.  I was just pulling your leg.



>I just
>didn't want you to be mad at me for writing about the reverse of the
>sort of relationship you like.


I understand.

But now it's time for ME to ask a question.

Since you are also a true crime buff, what is your opinion on the
identity of Jack the Ripper?

Specifically, what is your view as to the Maybrick Diary?  Is it a
fraud?  Or is it a remarkable historical work that solves the most
famous unsolved serial killings of all time by identifying "Jack" as
Liverpool cotton broker, James Maybrick?

Or does the truth lie in between?  Or are you not sure?

I'd be interested to know.

------------------------------------
grizzlieantagonist{at}yahoo.com

"Ladies and gentlemen - let's have a round of applause for tonight's
player of the game - FRAN-CIS-CO SAN-N-N-N-TOS!
    - Brian Anthony (P.A. announcer at Grizzlie Stadium), June 11, 2004


"Populus me sibilat, at mihi plaudo."(The people
hiss at me, but I am well satisfied with myself).

    - Horace, the Roman poet


Logical positivism, dominant in American and
British universities, is suicidally bent upon
establishing the impossibility of knowing any-
thing.  (As Wyndham Lewis suggested in "Self
Condemned", the neo-positivist pedant reduces
himself to a mosquito, able to wound, nearly
invulnerable to counter-assault - but only an
insect, not a man).

     - Russell Kirk, Enemies of the Permanent
       Things


--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/5/05 12:57:05 AM ---