In article ,
 "Hyerdahl"  wrote:

> Mark Sobolewski wrote:
> > In article ,
> >  "Hyerdahl"  wrote:
> >
> > > mark_sobolewski{at}yahoo.com wrote:
> > >
> > > > Steve Chaney, still taunting the happy fun ball wrote:
> > > > > In ,
"Society"
> > > > >  wrote:
> > > > >(edit)
> > >
> > > > Hello Steve,
> > > >
> >I think your dislike of me began when I fanned a flame war with Jet>
> over my racial dating preferences.
> > >
> > > Yes, Mark...we all know you don't want to date out of your race.
> That is your RIGHT.  It also shows some of the self-limitations you
> have placed on yourself based on race, and some folks may find that
> smacking of racism.
> >
> > Yep.  So what?
>
> So nothing, just an observation.

So my choices offend some people.  We all know that too.
Heck, it's the main reason I said so to get Jet riled. :-)

>  If I were on the dating market I'd not date a sexist.  That
> > is my right.  :-)
> >
> > And all the sexists of the world, I imagine, are just
> > crying in their beer over this fact. :-)
> >
> Hahahahaha....right.
> > > >
>  I don't think "rape is cool" but merely that marital rape, by
>  definition, doesn't really exist.
> > >
> >> Well, apparently it does exist since there have been cases brought
> on > that very issue.
> >
> > Very well, I could clarify and say the terms marriage
> > and rape are contradictory.  We live in interesting times
> > when gays want to join an insitution that was considered
> > only useful for Patriarchs to oppress women. :-)
>
> What?  I never once said or thought that marriage was ONLY useful for
> patriarchs.  That is was established because men wanted CONTROL is a
> historical fact, but surely there were other reasons for marriage as
> well.  AND today, the reason gays want marriage rights is so they will
> have the legal rights associated with marriage.

So apparently it wasn't such a bad deal for women after all. :-)

regards,
Mark Sobolewski


--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/5/05 8:23:25 PM ---