Doug Anderson (ethelthelogremovethis{at}yahoo.com) writes:
> dg411{at}FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Andre Lieven) writes:
>
>> Doug Anderson (ethelthelogremovethis{at}yahoo.com) evades and
>> ad homs:
>
> (snip rest of ravings)

Translation: " As I could not refute what he wrote, I made it go
away, so that my failure to refute would be less noticable. "

>> > Apparently you mean something else, since I haven't made any ad
>> > hominem attacks on you.  Want to translate for the rest of us?
>>
>> So, you can make UNsupported claim, and but everyone else has
>> to offer proofs, at your behest ?
>>
>> Hypocrite.
>
> Not at all.  You offered a bunch of quotes claiming it was "proof" of
> something.

And, they are. Your INability to refute the point, stands.

> I didn't "ask for" anything.

Too bad: These are public newsgroups. Anyone can post.

> Do you really think "ad hominem" means "unsupported claim?"

No: You did *both*. Deal with it.

> Brother.

Pass. I prefer human relatives.

Andre

--
" I'm a man... But, I can change... If I have to... I guess. "
                                    The Man Prayer, Red Green.


--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/6/05 4:24:09 AM ---