On 7 Mar 2005 04:37:37 -0800, "Curious_Orange"
 wrote:

>x-no-archive: yes
>
>peoplesim wrote:
>> Skinner1{at}hotmail.com wrote:
>> > Visit a Sperm Bank and one of them get's artifically inseminated
>and
>> > pregnant because they want to raise a child (Notice no moral
>> > judgements here folks!!).
>> >
>> > The "Mother" of the child is perfectly justified
under this logic
>in
>> > demanding the identity of the sperm donar so she can persue the man
>> > and make him live up to his responsability and pay child support.
>> >
>> > You write this one down guys....... I am telling you it's GONNA
>> > happen!!!
>>
>> Already happening in England. They've recently made sperm donation
>> non-anonymous, and the government officials in charge can't figure
>> out why donations have dropped precipitously.
>
>erm.... those rules aren't retrospective are they? (I cant find a
>reference to the story right now, but I do remember something about it
>on tv)
>
>there's a big difference between donating anonymously (as you
>understand it) and having the goalposts moved .... and donating while
>fully aware you might be traced at a future date.

Hell can place no obstacle in the path of a determined femanist.

There are efforts going on as we speak to open records and try to
determine the donar by DNA Analysis. At least I have heard of Verbal
reports. Maybe today I can get some research on it done??

In any event, you get a single mother and a lawyer that sees some
publicity and cash in store coupled up with a father hating family
court and there is nothing out of the realm of feasability.




--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/7/05 12:05:08 PM ---