Doug, I've posted this twice. Nobody seems to want to discuss this:



Ever heard of the Low Ball Technique, or the Foot in the Door technique?

One could argue that the satements by the radical feminists are just that,
radical statements. That they really have no value to a civilized society.

Hitler did much the same to the German population in getting them to accept
what was done to the Jewish people. Make outrageous statements, then make a
statement not quite so outrageous maybe something like"Boy's are too
aggressive in school". Something that many can buy into. That's how it
starts.

Look at our culture today" boys bad, girls good, fathers bad, mothers good,
the court system, women routinely recieving lesser sentences for the same
crimes, or even heinous crimes being excused with " It's her husbands
fault"
as was the Andrea Yates case. Men routinely hit by women in the media, we
consider it funny.

And YOU ACCEPT IT!

But you know what? It's not us that have to be worried. It's our sons and
grandsons. What kind of world will they inherit? More importantly, will they
be allowed to breed?

Hence the term FEMINAZI

The term is apt.

As far as reasoned arguments I offer this as to why I'm no longer interested
in discourse

> You have an odd notion of proof.
>
> All it seems to require is a peripherally related out-of-context quote
> from a few individuals and then you assert some sort of "proof."
>
> Or were you trying to prove your lack of interest in reasoned discourse?

Could anyone within the German population have taken the statements made by
Hitlers progaganda machine and stood up? Especially since the political
climate made it unwise to do so? Well take a look at the political
correctness machine in place today. Who of any consequence would dare to
stand up to the feminist propaganda machine in place today? Those that have
tried are crushed in the media and well intentioned, reasonable people don't
question it.

The old excuse" We didn't know" has been used for centuries. YOU are using
the same excuse. You won't look. It's easier not tto think.

All Andre is doing is offering proof, statements that show the femiinist
agenda made by radical feminists and not disavowed by so called mainstrean
feminist organizations.
I don't see for instance even you when Martha Burk as an example suggests
that males be neutered at birth standing up and saying wait a minute!  We
have to leave it to older men who refuse to be bullied by this woman and
lookat what the feminist controlled press did. You don't want to look at
that because trying to defend it in the supposed interests of fairness.
"Doug Anderson"  wrote in message
news:3928hlF5r4h9sU3{at}individual.net...
> dg411{at}FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Andre Lieven) writes:
>
>> Doug Anderson (ethelthelogremovethis{at}yahoo.com) imagines that he
>> understands other people's views, and is wrong yet again:
>> > "John Royer"  writes: >
>> >> "Doug Anderson"
 wrote in message
>> >> news:391jttF5tq0jcU2{at}individual.net...
>> >> > dg411{at}FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Andre Lieven) writes:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Doug Anderson (ethelthelogremovethis{at}yahoo.com) writes:
>> >> >> > "Jon565"
 writes:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > (snip)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Since feminism is a popular movement, I
think we need a list of
>> >> >> >> acceptable popular feminist literature
that you will consider
>> >> >> >> acceptable.  Thus far you are just
claiming that his evidence is
>> >> >> >> irrelevant.  This would be less painful
if you could give a few
>> >> >> >> suggestions.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Since feminism isn't really an organized movement,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> False: See " National Organisation *For*
Women ".
>> >> >
>> >> > NOW is an organization.  Feminism isn't an organized
movement.  You
>> >> > surely don't believe "feminism = NOW?"
>> >> And again we skirt the points and do spin
>> >
>> > But John, what point do you want to discuss?
>>
>> How about " Feminism, a special interest ? "
>
> You're not John, are you?
>
> Anyhow I disagree, feminism isn't a special interest, and if you look at
> what feminism has accomplished, I think that is clear.
>
>> > You post articles, Andre claims to have proven something through
>> > quotes and his rants.
>> >
>> > What is your "point?"
>>
>> Perhaps that Feminism is sexism, even. The name says it all.
>
> Again, I disagree.  If you look at what feminism has accomplished, it
> is a lessening of the gap between the way men and women are treated.
> That is the _opposite_ of sexism.
>
>
> I've snipped the rest of your quote since it consists only of insults,
> which certainly require no response.  They discredit you, and add
> nothing to a discussion.




--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/7/05 12:05:08 PM ---