"Tron" (tronfuru{at}frisurf.no) writes:
> "Andre Lieven"  skrev i melding
> news:d0gj79$qk$1{at}theodyn.ncf.ca...
>>
>>> They were permitted on navy ships.
>>
>> Not until very recently. In the US, still not on subs.
>
> I meant they were let aboard to meet their husbands once in a while.

On a few occasions when such subs are open to some of the public;
Usually wives meet their sub serving husbands when said husbands
get off of the sub.

>> Israel is often cited by fools who believe in the *myth* that Isreal
>> integrates women into combat units. That has not been true, since 1949.
>> See " Women In The Military; Flirting With Disaster ",
by Brian Mitchell.
>
> OK. One more for the guys.

Indeed. If you get a chnace, read the book.

>>>>not because they were incapable of firing a  weapon.
>>>
>>> I always thought their ability to fire weapons was an essential
>>> ingredient in their charm.
>>
>> OK, so you're wrong. No big.
>
> This was sexual innuendo. Sort of.

Does that work in bars, at all ? 

Andre

--
" I'm a man... But, I can change... If I have to... I guess. "
                                    The Man Prayer, Red Green.


--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/7/05 12:05:09 PM ---