Aggy wrote:

> Paul Eisner wrote:
>
>>Women are stealing the jobs from men,
>
> No dear.Women are not stealing jobs from men because men don't 'own' said
> jobs any more than women do so you can't steal something from someone if
> they don't own it in the first place
>
>>but they work much worse than
>>men but demanding the same money for substandard work.
>
> No dear. Women are doing the same jobs as men and at the same quality but
> get paid less for doing them. As we are doing the same job at the same
> quality then we should get paid the same. It's only fair, dear.
>
>>This forces companies to outsource to Mexico, India or other
>>countries.
>
> No dear. Exorbitant taxes and greed force companies to outsource to Mexico,
> India or other countries. exploiting these poor individuals and paying them
> a pittance and the companies reap the profits dear.

Greed - not taxes ---- Dear.

D.

>>So women are responsible for unemployement and outsourcing and that is
>>destroying our economy.
>
> No dear. That's greed.
>
>>The final result will be, that the men will be
>>unemployed, because the women stole their jobs and the women will be
>>unemployed, too, because their bad work forced companies to outsource
>>to India.
>
> Well done dear. I award you first prize for talking the biggest load of
> bollocks I have read since I joined this newsgroup
> *hands Paul a trophy*
> Smile for the camera dear

Sorry Paul but women are not losing us jobs that
are out-sourced.

They ofetn do not do the job as well as men; but
that is not the issue: if the employers thing
that women are not doing the job so well they
can sack the women or choose not to employ
inferior staff of whatever sex.

The real problem is that women are taking men's
jobs while still expectinmg men to hold down a
job and bring home the dinner meat - else he is
not a real man.

If the women were put back in the home (where
they belong) there would be no unemployment. In
UK the average working week is 56 hours. If
those 16 hours over the odds (it has for long
time been consisdered that 40 hourds is the
standard working week) and handed them out to
the unemployed - there would be no unemployement
(and, under this circumstance, we would not have
to stop women working).


D.



> Aggy
>
>



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/7/05 8:04:56 AM ---