MSGID: 1:2320/105.1 4159575b 
>Find it funny all those Trumpsters are still screaming about that.  The ACA
>was
>signed into law on March 23, 2010 which, according to my calender, was a shade
>over 400 days when the previous president took the oath.  So where was it
>'rammed down the throats' of anyone? People need to understand 'time' must be
>put into the equation when it comes to defining 'rammed'. 64 days is more
>inline with 'being rammed'. But alas, it's all moot now as even with a stacked
>deck the GOP still failed misirably... but what else is new.

But the ACA was not written up 400 days before it was voted on.  I do
remember sound-bytes of Democratic leaders asking their fellow party members
to go ahead and vote on it without reading it.

I agree, 64 days was not enough.  I am not exactly sure what the rush was,
other than to keep a campaign promise.  I would rather them have a good idea
of what they plan to replace it with, OR a plan that improves the problems it
has developed, VS. just chucking it out "just because."

I know it has its problems, but a lot of money has been spent on getting it
to where it is.  I would rather see them improve it and that money not be
wasted.

Mike

---
 * SLMR 2.1a * "Did you open the Microwave door before the 'ding'"?


--- GTMail 1.26