From: "John D.Wentzky" 

"Ray Fischer"  wrote in message
news:4602b60f$0$14085$742ec2ed{at}news.sonic.net...
> John D.Wentzky  wrote:
>>"thomas p."  wrote in message
>>news:1174542611.921031.259270{at}l75g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>>> On 21 Mar., 18:23, "John D.Wentzky"

>>> wrote:
>>>> "Ray Fischer"  wrote in message
>>>>
>>>> news:46015751$0$14102$742ec2ed{at}news.sonic.net...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > John D.Wentzky  wrote:
>>>> >>"Anlatt the Builder"
 wrote in message
>>>> >>>  "John D.Wentzky"

>>>>
>>>> >>>> > Courts are permitted to declare laws
unconstitutional.
>>>>
>>>> >>>> Wrong.
>>>>
>>>> >>> Courts. Are not. Permitted. To declare laws.
Unconstitutional.
>>>>
>>>> >>> You actually claim that?
>>>>
>>>> >>Yes. At least in part.
>>>> >>There are rules to be adhered to.
>>>>
>>>> > Rules which you pull out of your ass.
>>>>
>>>> > The rules stated in the Constitution say that the
courts do have the
>>>> > responsibility to decide whether laws are unconstitutional.
>>>>
>>>> Which would give the USSC authority to strike down roevwade.
>>>
>>> And your point would be?  Nobody argued that they agreed with every
>>> decision the court makes, only that the court has the right to
>>> determine the constitutionality of laws in cases brought before it.
>>
>>They can only determine something to be unconstitutional if it violates
>>the
>>Constitution.
>
> And laws against abortion violated the constitution.

No they didn't.
They violated man's right to kill.
LOL!

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag