On Feb 24, 11:33=A0am, "Michael J. Mahon"  wrote:
> Jeff Blakeney wrote:
> > =A0 To: Michael J. Mahon
> > On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 10:59:35 -0800, Michael J. Mahon wrote:
>
> >>Charlie wrote:
>
> >>>Isn't there another 128KB of RAM dedicated to the sound
generation chi=
p?
>
> >>That's 64K.
>
> > But the Ensoniq is able to deal with 128 KB of RAM connected to it. =A0=
I'm
> > surprised no one has done a hardware hack to piggyback the RAM and
> > double the size of the sound buffer. =A0Imagine the MIDISynth wave bank=
s
> > that could be made with twice as much room for samples. =A0:)
>
> I wonder if the toolset allows for 17-bit addresses, or the equivalent
> bank-selection bit...

Probably not, but that's easily fixed if the hardware hack is
doable ...
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32