From: "John D.Wentzky" 

"No One"  wrote in message
news:87fy7xiaj4.fsf{at}nospam.pacbell.net...
> "John D.Wentzky"  writes:
>
>> "thomas p."  wrote in message
>> news:1174542611.921031.259270{at}l75g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>> > On 21 Mar., 18:23, "John D.Wentzky"

>> > wrote:
>>
>> > And your point would be?  Nobody argued that they agreed with every
>> > decision the court makes, only that the court has the right to
>> > determine the constitutionality of laws in cases brought before it.
>>
>> They can only determine something to be unconstitutional if it
>> violates the Constitution.  Check the Separation of powers
>> requirement that was violated by the USSC in 1973 in roevwade.
>
> "Separation of powers" does not mean "Wentzky agrees with the
> decision."

It means the USSC had no authority to override Texas' or any other State's
non-roevwade position.

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag