Avenger wrote:
> "Hyerdahl"  wrote in message
> news:1112465054.600519.267310{at}o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Grizzlie Antagonist wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2 Apr 2005 10:17:52 +1200, "geopelia"

> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >"Dave Symn" 
wrote in message
> > > >news:1112201844.ec5caabcc14fe247c5d2204bcf812322{at}bubbanews...
> > > >> On 30 Mar 2005 08:57:10 -0800, John Templeton wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> > What does food have to do with it?
> > > >>
> > > >> Nothing, she's just hell-bent on finding some fuct
up criteria
to
> > show>> female soldiers as "superior" in certain
pointless aspects
and
> > discredit> this report. It's hopeless and her idiocy is in rare
form today.
> >
> > I have no NEED to show women "superior" in order to highlight the
> > sexist criteria men use to keep women out.  If an army travels on
it's
> > stomach, feeding a female military is easier than feeding a male
one.
> > If women have better eye hand cooridination, that would be another
> > advantage to women.  But I don't see women trying to keep men out.
:-)
> >
> > (edit)
> >
> >
> >It's just more of the "women are strong and good and men are
>  bad and weak" line that popular culture spews out.
> >
> >
> > Again, I do see men continuously trying to exclude women based on
some
> > few differences as contrasted and compared with the amount women
and
> > men have in common.  I don't see women trying to exclude men from
any
> > societal institution.
>
> Are you really as STUPID as you sound or are you just looking for
attention?
>
Since you didn't comment on my 'offering' above, I'm assuming it is YOU
either stupid or looking for attention.

>
> We can easily prove that females are inferior to men. Take a 1000 men
and
> women of the same age, train them the same, equip them the same and
let them
> go to war against each other and see who wins :o)
>
Well, that just goes to show how truely stupid you really are.  Not
only are you willing to resort to violence (which seems to be the first
resort of the stupid and the last resort of the inept) but you are
willing to waste 2000 people to make your test.  How foolish, and just
like an insecure man.  Here's the thing, dear;  if you were to place
1000 men against another 1000 men, one group would win and one would
lose; what would THAT prove, that men were better than men?  :-)  Our
military personnel work together to fight the enemy, and they seem to
be doing a fair job of that, given our huge technological abilities.
Our military is not likely to pit women against men because they are
smart while you are just plain stupid.



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 4/3/05 1:00:36 PM ---