From: "John D.Wentzky" 

"No One"  wrote in message
news:87k5x9iame.fsf{at}nospam.pacbell.net...
> "John D.Wentzky"  writes:
>
>> "Dionisio"  wrote in message
>> news:4601f10f$0$16666$4c368faf{at}roadrunner.com...
>> > John D.Wentzky wrote:
>> >
>> >>>The rules stated in the Constitution say that the
courts do have the
>> >>>responsibility to decide whether laws are unconstitutional.
>> >>
>> >> Which would give the USSC authority to strike down roevwade.
>> >
>> > Well, of course it's got the authority. It's just never seen a good
>> > reason
>> > to do so.
>>
>> Bullshit. You mean the USSC justices don't know the Constitution?
>> How about that separation of powers clause that the USSC ignored in 1973
>> because of their own crimes when they tried to cover their own asses?
>> Two crimes in this case.
>> 1. Illegal abortion
>> 2. Treason against the Constitution of the United States of America.
>
> Nonsense

Your opinion of the Constitutional requirements. LOL!

> - the Supreme Court declared an anti-abortion law illegal in
> Roe versus Wade, but did not perform an abortion (which would be
> illegal for the Supreme Court to do as the court would have to
> practice medicine without a license) and it in no sense committed
> "treason" (unless perhaps you mean installing King George Bus to rule
> over us in 2000 :-)).

That is how it is suppoed to be to you? Weird.
Are you trying to tell me that the AMA has an exclusive right to all
abortion records?
You are the fool if you think that.

> Talk about delusions on Wentzky's part!

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag