C>I bought this album on CD a couple of days ago. It's the first time
C>I've heard the whole thing for at least 15 years and I've got to say
C>that I'm stunned. This album is wonderful. Dare I say it, but I'd even
C>say that I like this album over any other Beatle album.
Blasphemy! First you don't like ELP, and now this? Where did we go wrong?
Anyway, I could say the same thing about _MMT_. The White Album doesn't have
the flow of _MMT_, _SPLHCB_, or _Abbey Road_, but, much like _Physical
Graffiti_, it showed depths one might not have suspected in the Beatles. It
wanders around a lot, and almost comes off as the all-time great comp album
(Lennon songs, McC songs, and some Harrison stuff).
C>What I like so much about this is the wide range of styles and ups and
C>downs. It's the most Progressive of any of their albums, too. A couple
C>of the songs are obvious King Crimson influences. The only song that I
C>could really do without is "Revolution 9."
Yeah, but that "number 9" thing was a major ... event of the 70's, and is
remembered by anyone who got familiar with the album. number 9; number 9
I used that joke this week, in fact.
C>What's the consensus on this echo about this album, anyway?
I like the 3 mentioned above more because of the flow of the albums, or the
sides in the case of _MMT_ (which is really 2 great 15 minute albums; side 1
is movie songs, and side 2 is singles that weren't on an album, and includes
some of their best psych singles.
White Album is a masterpiece, though, in that they did so much and kept the
energy levels so high. It's still the Beatles. The worst part of White is
still better than Spector's mess on _Let It Be_.
Stuart
---
* PW *
--- WILDMAIL!/WC v4.12
---------------
* Origin: Tulare Co Office of Educ, Visalia, CA (1:214/33.0)
|