name_and_address_supplied{at}hotmail.com (Name And Address Supplied) wrote in
message news:...
> jimmcginn{at}yahoo.com (Jim McGinn) wrote in message
news:...
> > name_and_address_supplied{at}hotmail.com (Name And Address Supplied)
wrote in message news:...
> > > jimmcginn{at}yahoo.com (Jim McGinn) wrote in message
news:...
> > > > All I'm saying is that the purpose of science,
scientific methods,
> > > > theories, etc. is prediction.  Obviously predictions will be more
> > > > accurate if the underlying assumptions of one's theory
are also more
> > > > accurate.  And, equally obviously, relativistic
assumptions are more
> > > > accurate.
> > > 
> > > Then why are you hanging on to absolute measures of relatedness when
> > > the scientific community has, beginning with Hamilton in 1964,
> > > realised that it is infact a relativistic concept?
> > 
> > Complete nonsense.  You don't even know what a relativistic assumptions is.
> > 
> 
> You are rapidly increasing the likelihood of my hypothesis, Jim. 
> These silly, evasive remarks are boring.

This was your opportunity to disavow me of my belief that you really
don't even have much of a grasp of the issues being discussed.  You
failed.

Jim
---
þ RIMEGate(tm)/RGXPost V1.14 at BBSWORLD * Info{at}bbsworld.com

---
 * RIMEGate(tm)V10.2áÿ* RelayNet(tm) NNTP Gateway * MoonDog BBS
 * RgateImp.MoonDog.BBS at 10/26/02 12:02:57 PM