Grizzlie Antagonist wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Apr 2005 10:17:52 +1200, "geopelia"

> wrote:
>
> >"Dave Symn"  wrote in message
> >news:1112201844.ec5caabcc14fe247c5d2204bcf812322{at}bubbanews...
> >> On 30 Mar 2005 08:57:10 -0800, John Templeton wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> > What does food have to do with it?
> >>
> >> Nothing, she's just hell-bent on finding some fuct up criteria to
show
> >> female soldiers as "superior" in certain pointless
aspects and
discredit
> >> this report. It's hopeless and her idiocy is in rare form today.

I have no NEED to show women "superior" in order to highlight the
sexist criteria men use to keep women out.  If an army travels on it's
stomach, feeding a female military is easier than feeding a male one.
If women have better eye hand cooridination, that would be another
advantage to women.  But I don't see women trying to keep men out.  :-)

(edit)


> > > > It's just more of the "women are strong and good and men are
bad and
> weak" line that popular culture spews out.


Again, I do see men continuously trying to exclude women based on some
few differences as contrasted and compared with the amount women and
men have in common.  I don't see women trying to exclude men from any
societal institution.



>
>
>
>



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 4/2/05 4:48:14 PM ---