From: "Gary Wiltshire" 

On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 14:44:53 -0400, Adam Flinton
 wrote:

> Gary Wiltshire wrote:
>> On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 02:18:38 -0400, Adam Flinton
>>   wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>>  It's still different.  Nobody is going to be presenting
>>>> Shakespear's   account as "evidence" vs. a
government document from
>>>> that time.   That's  the difference in the present between
the scummy
>>>> miniseries  that CBS  chickened out on about the Reagans vs. the
>>>> documents that  Rather & Co.  were hawking.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yesterday I watched a new interview of Cheney where he was asked
>>> about  the memo & his answer was "that memo was
written some time
>>> before the  war."
>>>
>>>
>>> Not that the memo was wrong or a fake or anything like that. Just
>>> that  it was written some time before the war.
>>>
>>>
>>> Adam
>>   Whether it was written before the war or not had not bearing on
>> whether it  was fake.
>>  While we're at it, I remember YOU having a hissy fit about us using
>> some  document which you said was a forgery -- something to do with
>> obtaining  yellow cake, IIRC?
>>
>
>
> That was a forgery. What's the problem with that? This memo was not.
>
> Maybe treating forgeries & real content as being the same is something
> you should look at.
>
> Adam

Ah, it's OK for me to forge a document, artificially age it, lie about it's
origins as long as I belive the content to be true?

--
Gary Wiltshire

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5