From: "Mark" 


"Adam Flinton"  wrote in message
news:42c04a2f{at}w3.nls.net...
> Mark wrote:
>> "Gary Wiltshire"  wrote in message
>> news:op.ss1jtaa4eipai0{at}news.barkto.com...
>>
>>>On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 19:25:20 -0400, Mark
 wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>It's extremely disturbing, but it's the logical extension
of the liberal
>>>>mind-set as witnessed by the 5 that caused it to be so vs. the 4 that
>>>>dissented. Do the liberals here still want their Dem
representatives to
>>>>filibuster conservative nominees to replace any of them if
they die or
>>>>retire?
>>>>
>>>
>>>This is all making the true justification for the 2nd amendment more
>>>attractive.  As Ramius suggests to Ryan as they cruise up the river in
>>>Maine in The Hunt For Red October, "A little revolution
now and then is a
>>>good thing."
>>>
>>>Down the road there's going to be blood over this one.
>>
>>
>> If we were smart we'd field a 5-10 million person strong demonstation
>> outside the Supreme Court building and keep it going until they went back
>> into session and reversed themselves. It'd be amusing in a way, with
>> liberals and conservatives united in the demonstration and spending the
>> day arguing about Iraq amongst ourselves. 
>>
>>
>>
> Can they reverse themselves? Surely another case would need to be brought
> & accepted etc.

I believe you're correct -- then again after a month or so of 10M people
demonstrating (with fresh newly evicted people coming all the time) they
may fast track a new case 

>
> Adam

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5