Hello, Richard...

Jan 20, 2009 at 18:40, Richard Webb wrote to Sean Dennis:

 RW> Hi SEan,

 RW> On Wed 2037-Jan-14 23:38, Sean Dennis (1:18/200) wrote to All:

 SD>> I'm wondering whether I should use the DOS or Win32 version of BT
 SD>> with SPITFIRE since SF is DOS-based.  The board will eventually be
 SD>> running under W2K.

 RW> From my reading of the docs I understand that there's
 RW> problems with the w32 version passing a com port to a dos
 RW> based bbs, but could be wrong.  I"d run the dos version of
 RW> btto be safe.

That is absolutely true (the port handoff problem), but unfortunately I no
longer remember the details. I was trying it under Win98, though, and
haven't tried it under XP. The problem is that a DOS program needs
exclusive use of the port, and won't let go of it until it terminates. When
it does, it's parent DOS program (in this case, the DOS command
interpreter) inherits it and won't let go.

With XP, the command interpreter is a completely different (32-bit) beast,
the problem might no longer exists.

Regards,

Jerry Schwartz

mailto:jerryschwartz{at}comfortable.com
http://www.writebynight.com

--- Msged/NT 6.0.1