From: rfischer{at}sonic.net (Ray Fischer)

H Dickmann  wrote:
>
>"MarkA"  wrote in message
>news:pan.2007.03.23.03.49.12.521900{at}nowhere.com...
>> On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 12:07:22 -0700, skyeyes wrote:
>>
>>> On Mar 22, 7:47 am, "H Dickmann"
 wrote:
>>>
>>>> Tell me about social progress in 20 years from now when 30% of women
>>>> chose never to have Children.
>>>
>>> Newsflash:  not all women want children.  Not all women *like* children.
>>> It's funny, if having children is so bloody wonderful, why does the rate
>>> of childbirth go down whenever and wherever women have access to higher
>>> education and personal choice?  Do you think women are intended to be
>>> nothing but baby machines?
>>>
>>> Why do you want to force women to have children they do not
want?  Do you
>>> realize how messed up such children are?  Do you realize that there are
>>> already 6.5 *billion* people on this benighted planet already?
>>>
>>
>> Catholics do not believe that there is any limit to how many people the
>> Earth can support.
>
>Not correct,

No, it's pretty much correct

>If you want to limit the worlds population start with poor countries where
>people deliberately have a dozen children so they have someone to support
>them in sickness and old age.

The Catholic church is opposed to limiting the number of children.

--
Ray Fischer
rfischer{at}sonic.net

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag