From: Adam Flinton 

Gary Wiltshire wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 14:44:53 -0400, Adam Flinton
>   wrote:
>
>> Gary Wiltshire wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 02:18:38 -0400, Adam Flinton
>>>   wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>  It's still different.  Nobody is going to be presenting
>>>>> Shakespear's   account as "evidence" vs. a
government document
>>>>> from  that time.   That's  the difference in the present between
>>>>> the scummy  miniseries  that CBS  chickened out on about the
>>>>> Reagans vs. the  documents that  Rather & Co.  were hawking.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yesterday I watched a new interview of Cheney where he was asked
>>>> about  the memo & his answer was "that memo was
written some time
>>>> before the  war."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Not that the memo was wrong or a fake or anything like that. Just
>>>> that  it was written some time before the war.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Adam
>>>
>>>   Whether it was written before the war or not had not bearing on
>>> whether it  was fake.
>>>  While we're at it, I remember YOU having a hissy fit about us using
>>> some  document which you said was a forgery -- something to do with
>>> obtaining  yellow cake, IIRC?
>>>
>>
>>
>> That was a forgery. What's the problem with that? This memo was not.
>>
>> Maybe treating forgeries & real content as being the same is
>> something  you should look at.
>>
>> Adam
>
>
> Ah, it's OK for me to forge a document, artificially age it, lie about
> it's origins as long as I belive the content to be true?
>

Nah coz you're not President Bush. Only true believers can get away with
telling untruths while using  professed belief that something is true as a
sheild.

Here the content was accurate. That it was accurate can be seen from the
reactions of the UK pols who were in a position to ascertain it's validity.

"That memo was written before" etc quotes from the likes of Blair.

So Gary, your President is a mendacious hypocritical incompetant, & you
voted for that.

Adam

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5