On 8 Mar 2005 07:37:19 -0800, "Hyerdahl"  wrote:

>
>Skinner1{at}hotmail.com wrote:
>> 
>>
>> >>
>> >> there's a big difference between donating anonymously (as you
>> >> understand it) and having the goalposts moved .... and donating
>while> fully aware you might be traced at a future date.
>> >
>> >There were some of us who KNEW that the promises that the donors
>would never > >be exposed and forced to pay was bullshit from the
>start. Only FOOLS >believed it. California was the first state whose
>courts nullified the  >contracts for anonymity! Why?  That's simple....
>"DADDY ALWAYS PAYS!"  >ALWAYS!!!
>
>Then you HAVE a case where a legal sperm donor, making a donation at a
>legal clinic had to pay child support for the child conceived thru his
>donation?  Nope.  You don't.
>>
>> Yep. And nothing will stand in the way of a femanist or a golddigger
>> in digging into your pockets!!
>
>Then show us the case....
>
>http://www.umr-cpma.ch/en/articles/sperm_donation/000471.php

You need to keep up. I posted several links concerning this..... Most
notably is the Harrisburg PA case:

http://www.canadiancrc.com/articles/Patriot_News_Sperm_donor_loses_appeal_child_support_23JUL04.htm





--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/8/05 12:08:36 PM ---