From: "Tony Ingenoso" 

One counter-example is all it takes to disprove a blanket statement.  That
counter-example exists (along with the bio-cookers everyone wants to deny
exist too)

If there is one, there will be more because that one came from somewhere.
It didn't spontaneously generate out of thin air.


"Don Hills"  wrote in message
news:FbcyCtgaXCQW092yn{at}attglobal.net...
> In article , "Gary Britt"

wrote:
> >They found artillery shells with nerve gas.  One nerve gas weapon was
used
> >in an IED against USA troops.  Nerve gas is a chemical weapon.  Chemical
> >weapons are WMD.  Therefore finding nerve gas is finding WMD.
>
> Tell it to the judge. The "official" WMD seekers acknowledged that
> that shell wasn't evidence of the WMD they were looking for.
>
> >Until we search every square inch of sand and concrete in Iraq, the
search
> >isn't over.
>
> I just took a look at what defines a fanatic. You're one.
> Ask not for whom the fat lady sings, Gary. She sings for you...
>
> --
> Don Hills    (dmhills at attglobaldotnet)     Wellington, New Zealand
> "New interface closely resembles Presentation Manager,
>  preparing you for the wonders of OS/2!"
>     -- Microsoft advertisement on the box for Windows 2.11 for 286

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5