From: "Tony Ingenoso" 

http://www.greenpeace.org/international/press/releases/greenpeace-demands-full-
disclo

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2004/07/06/us_flies_radio
active_items_out_of_iraq/

"The low-enriched uranium taken from Iraq, if it is of the 3 percent
to 5 percent level of enrichment common in fuel for commercial power
reactors, could have been of value to a country developing enrichment
technology. "It speeds up the process," Oelrich said, adding that
1.95 tons of low-enriched uranium could be used to produce enough highly
enriched uranium to make a single nuclear bomb."

You can apologize now for wasting my time.


"Robert Comer"  wrote in message
news:42c5e6fc$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> You know how things work here, you make a claim you back it up with a
link.
> (if it's verifiable on the web, of course)  I really don't think you're
> remembering this one right -- there was mention that Saddam had that
before
> the war, but they never found anything.
>
> But anyway, I did search, and I found no mention of enough enriched
uranium
> to build one bomb, and a lot of mention about just how Saddam didn't have
> the capability to make enriched uranium.  Even the greenpeace site (now
> there's a respectable newssource) never mention anything about enriched
> uranium, just radioactive materials. (including some un-enriched uranium)
>
> - Bob Comer
>
>
> "Tony Ingenoso"  wrote in message
> news:42c5d756$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> > This is getting tedious.  I'm not your fucking private research
> > organization.
> >
> > It was mentioned in the OakRidger, UN announcments, and in GreenPeace
> > press
> > releases that I'm aware of.
> >
> > Look it up yourself.
> >
> > "Robert Comer" 
wrote in message
> > news:42c5aaf7$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> >> > How about enough enriched uranium for a bomb or two? 
(we confiscated
> > that
> >> > and sent it to Oak Ridge)
> >>
> >> Proof?
> >>
> >> - Bob Comer
> >
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5