From: Adam Flinton 

Gary Britt wrote:
> I think its quite possible that the "notes" are deliberately
confusing when
> read, and may not clearly state "Karl Rove told me Valerie Plame is a CIA
> undercover agent, and is married to Wilson ,etc. etc."  The notes
might be a
> scribbled line.  "Karl Rove called me on this date and told me some
> background on Wilson".  Next scribbled line "Valerie Plame,
Wilson's wife,
> is an undercover CIA agent".
>
> Now the MSM will of course say those notes say Rove was the leak, but that
> isn't what those notes say.  So how would you figure out what was meant by
> those notes???  You put the reporter on the stand under oath, and ask him
> "Who told you Valerie Plame is an undercover CIA operative
??"   "Do these
> notes say Karl Rove gave you that information??"
>
> Guess what, the reporter and Time now say  he shouldn't have to answer any
> questions at all now that his notes have been released.
>
> I smell something rotten going on here, and its name is "Yet Another MSM
> Fraud Against The Bush Administration".   YAMSMFAB
>

Odd how you seem to smell so many rotten things & yet completely missed
the lack of WMD in Iraq & the completley bogus set of claims made to
make believe they were there..

How strange. You must have become accustomed to the smell coming from the
Bush administration.

Adam

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5