From: Adam Flinton 

Tony Ingenoso wrote:
> If you want to introduce the "trucks crossing the border
freely" notion, you
> logically have to accept that their cargos could have been anything from
> toilet paper to WMD since they were obviously never intercepted or
> inventoried by us.
>

Thousands of trucks cross the US-Mexico border every day. Is the US
shiiping nukes to Mexico?

After all from you are following the bizarre logic of Rumsfeld ie. absence
of proof is not proof of absence.

So theose trucks could have been carrying flocks of Dodo's & large
numbers of triceratops.

Adam




> I'm not really expecting any logic from you though.  That much has become
> very clear.
>
> "Robert G Lewis"  wrote in message
> news:42c47368$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>
>>No. Not what I said but go ahead and make something else up.
>>
>>
>>"Tony Ingenoso"  wrote in message
>>news:42c46324$3{at}w3.nls.net...
>>
>>>No.
>>>
>>>You seem to be opening up the possibility that WMD may have left the
>>>country
>>>via the same conduit though.
>>>
>>>Or maybe those trucks only operated with certain cargos via some as yet
>>>undisclosed ignition interlock mechanism...
>>>
>>>Does a truck care what its cargo is?
>>>
>>>"Robert G Lewis"  wrote in message
>>>news:42c35455$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>>
>>>>I guess you missed the stories about the looters and
convoys of 'scrap'
>>>>going to Jordan after the invasion.
>>>
>>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5