From: dmhills{at}attglobal.net (Don Hills)

In article , "Tony Ingenoso"
 wrote:
>
>You can apologize now for wasting my time.

You're getting as bad as Rich. They found enough radioactive material to
make a bomb, *IF* it was properly processed. Adam can no doubt refresh your
memory on the enrichment technology that Saddam tried (and failed) to buy.

My point is that the material is no more a WMD than all the chemicals that
*could* be used to manufacture chemical weapons, *IF* he had the technology.
A chemical processing ("fertiliser") plant is a lot easier to
come by than uranium enrichment equipment...

So. No credible WMD have been found in Iraq. Certainly nothing that could
be used tactically. Remember, for it to be a WMD credible enough to justify
the invasion of Iraq there had to be enough of it to cause Mass
Destruction, ready for deployment in - what was it? - 45 minutes?

--
Don Hills    (dmhills at attglobaldotnet)     Wellington, New Zealand
"New interface closely resembles Presentation Manager,
 preparing you for the wonders of OS/2!"
    -- Microsoft advertisement on the box for Windows 2.11 for 286

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5