PE> lousy on an SQPACKP.  Something like 4 times longer than HPFS16 for
PE> the SAME CACHE SIZE (2 meg)!  I found that if I used HPFS386 and did a

PC> have you tried giving it over 6mb of cache? that's when you see a speed 
PC> increase. otherwise it runs the same speed as hpfs16.

Yes I did.  At one stage I was running with something like 16 meg, or some
equally ridiculous number.  Not so ridiculous when you have 64 meg of
memory though.  :-)  I am a great believer in disk cache using main memory!
 In fact, one of the reasons I want to move to Linux, is because I am under
the impression it is really good at that, using ALL of your (unused) memory
for a disk cache!  BFN.  Paul. 
@EOT:

---