RW> SS> Just finished Dick Francis' "To the Hilt" & really liked it.
  > SS> OTOH, I always enjoy his work.  I've been trying to get up to date
RW>I've rarely been able to get hooked on Francis' books. Not sure why, they
  >just don't click with me.
       Oh well, if we all liked the same stuff the world would be a
   boring place.
RW> SS> on Linda Barnes' Carlotta Carlyle series & right now I can't recall
RW>I like this series also, kind of light and quick to read, generally 
enjoyabl
      Indeed.  Not in my top 10 but definitely a good quick read.
RW> SS> also reading Marcia Muller's Sharon McCone series.  I really like
  >I've never read any of this series, tell me a bit about it.
      Set in San Francisco & it's really best if read in order--which I
  didn't, of course.  Lots of local color & Sharon really is an
  appealing heroine, IMHO.
  > SS> isn't going much of anywhere these days.  I hate it when it
  > SS> acts like my social life. 
RW>Well this message made it into the great never-never of FIDO land. I think
  >social life is what I had in college, then I got married and a mortgage.
      You had a social life in college.  I was too busy going to parties
  & drinking beer. 
RW>I just finished 'The Secret History' by Donna Tartt. It kind of plods 
long
  >and I nearly put it aside a couple of times, but I'm glad that I didn't. 
t
  >is worth the effort to get to the end, and the slow pace of the book is
  >probably intentional, to mirror the characters view.  She uses the names 
f
  >several actual Inns, restaurants, and hotels in the book; but 
geographically
  >shuffles there locations. Just an interesting point, but I wonder why she
  >didn't just make up names?
         Poetic license?
RW>I've now finished SHTR and it was pretty good. Campbell gets on the 
soapbox 
  >bit and that got a bit tiring, but she does have a very real and valid 
ase
  >about spousal abuse. The ending was a bit too neat and tidy for my liking, 
b
  >that's kind of nit-picking.
    I try very hard not to do that myself.  I do realize that various of
  my favorite authors use their books as a forum for their personal
  agenda but as long as it doesn't interfere with the story, I don't
  mind a lot.  When I was finishing my BA, I wrote a story centered on
  spousal abuse & my professor gave me a B+ instead of an A because my
  story was "unrealistic".  I passed it along to several women I knew
  who said the prof was off his rocker.  As a result I've come to
  believe that I can't be too critical because very often my experience
  with the author's agenda may be, at best, different, & at worst,
  non-existent.
RW>I'm not reading a book by that isn't from either of her series. It's 
alled
  >'The Horn of Roland' and it has all the hallmarks of Peters' writing, good
  >plotting, strongly drawn characters.  I'm liking it a lot so far.
      All these titles are noted for future reference.  Thanks!
RW> SS> * QMPro 1.53 * My inner child is now on a milk carton.
  >Good tag! - stolen!
      Consider it a gift!
     Just finished _Miracles in Maggody_ by Joan Hess.  Gave me some
  much-needed giggles.  Just started William Bernhardt's _Double
  Jeopardy_ &, so far, I like it.  It's a lot more grisly than his
  "Justice" series so if you lean away from that, you may not like it.
      Read Steve Martini's _The Judge_ & can't put my finger on why I
  didn't like it.  It was my first by him & I don't think I'm in a hurry
  to read another.
                               Best regards,
                                       Sharon
 * QMPro 1.53 * When will they write: Where in Hell is Carmen Sandiego?
--- FLAME v1.1
---------------