On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 10:43:11 -0500, Mike Smith 
transparently proposed:

>On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 23:18:38 -0000, John Henry
> wrote:
>
>>Oh for fuck's sake.  If you're such a piss-poor parent that your child can
>>*be* brainwashed, then they deserve it.
>
>You will have a different opinion when you have kids.

He does, fuckstick.

>
>>What money is coming out of your pocket to 'support' homosexuality?  Are
>
>It did when I was in college and it went to pay NAMBLA to come to the
>school.  (The Bi Gay Lesbian Alliance orchestrated and paid for it out
>of activities fee monies so don't tell me there is no connection
>between homosexuals and NAMBLA)  It does in the government schools
>with books like Daddy's Roommate and Heather's Two Mommies which is
>early elementary school books in many schools today.

So you have no proof, just your homophobia.

>
>>you that frightened that your children will find out what kind of
>>chickenshit bigot you are?  What's the matter, still in denial about the
>>overt homosexuality involved in all those adolescent late-night circle-
>>jerks?
>
>In the gutter already are we?  You ran out of substance pretty quick.

What substance have you posted? All I read was homophobic ranting.

>
>>Yeah, that has worked SO well in the past.  Just ask those two guys in
>>Texas.
>
>huh?

That was called substance, couched in sarcasm. If you actually read
and understood the issues then you would have known of what John was
writing.

>
>>?!  What ways are heterosexuals 'not allowed' to talk about their
>>sexuality that homosexuals are?
>
>I have heard some pretty graphic stuff in one place I worked, and the
>women ate it up who were the primary recipients about it.  I happened
>to be present when one guy talked about recruiting a 16 year old.  I
>left the room when that shit started but I was thinking to myself,
>what if I would launch into talking about having sex with a female of
>any age, let alone a 16 year old girl?  I would be fired before I
>finished the sentence.  This guy was proud of it and bragged about it.

More homophobia without actual substance. Keep going the petard looks
like it is about to explode.

>
>Are you really that stupid that you have no clue this stuff goes on?

Are you so homophobic that you cannot see that you are a homophobe?

>
>>> What exactly is a "homophobe"?
>>
>>You.
>
>HAHAHAA, you so funny!

Lack of substance and lack of response noted.

>
>>Yes, really.  As an attractive heterosexual man, I have been hit on by
>
>Doubtful that you are heterosexual if you are hit on THAT much..

BWAHAHAHA.
:In the gutter already are we?  You ran out of substance pretty quick.
Remember that line?

>
>>> My wake-up call was when I was in college and my money
>>> (Activities fees) was used to have the NAMBLA crowd come to the campus
>>> and give a speech.
>>
>>You're a lying fucknozzle, no such thing ever happened anywhere at any
>>time, ever.  You're lying, because you know there's no truth that will
>
>Wow, have you seen any black helicopters lately?

Lack of proof noted.

>
>>objectively support  your irrational fear of homosexual men.  Of course,
>>you have no problem with lesbians or bi-sexual women, as long as they let
>>you watch.  Typical soc.man.
>
>>[NB:  I'll retract the first two sentences in this paragraph if you can
>>provide objective evidence that the event you describe ever happened.]
>
>I don't care what you claim to believe or not.  I am sure that there
>are a lot of people that know this stuff goes on.  I am sure it
>happens at places like Cal Berkley the most.

No, it did not.

>
>>That's nice, but what does this have to do with homosexuality?
>
>OK, real simple.  NAMBLA= North American Man Boy Love Association.
>What is it about man-boy love that isn't homosexual?

It is called pedophilia. Get your dictionary out and read. Ask any gay
or lesbian what they think of pedophiles and you will discover a
surprising fact.

>
>>irrational, unsupportable correlation between pedophilia and
>>homosexuality.
>
>NAMBLA= North American Man Boy Love Association.   Did you see "man
>boy"  in the MB part of NAMBLA?  Maybe not.  You need to do some
>research yourself.  Start with http://www.nambla.org/

See above, your ignorance is quite unsurprising.

>
>>Of course, if the pedophilia is *heterosexual*, you have no problem with
>>it, just like the rest of the soc.bjois, whose collective motto seems to
>
>OK, dude, obviously you are a functional illiterate if you can't read.
>NAMBLA doesn't support heterosexual relationships.  NAMBLA is only
>about abusing little boys.  They are a sick organization and shouldn't
>be supported by anyone.

Well you have one thing correct. Stopped clocks not withstanding.

>
>>be 'if she's old enough to bleed, she's old enough to breed.'  Maybe y'all
>>should start being honest and change it to 'if she's old enough to pee,
>>she's old enough for me!'
>
>If there was an equally sick organization which proclaims to hook up
>adult males and little girls I would be equally opposed to it.  I am
>not aware of any but I don't go out and look for that kind of stuff
>either.  NAMBLA exists and I know about it only because the outrageous
>action of the college where I went to school who paid them to give a
>speech there.

Liar, you still have yet to post proof. Given your ignorance, I also
doubt that you have attended any schools beyond your local grade
school.

>
>>Sick bastards.
>
>Yes, NAMBLA are a bunch of homosexual sick bastards.

So you have said many times. Now back up your k'lame they were paid to
come to a college, anywhere...



--

Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?


--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/9/05 12:08:42 PM ---