From: The Chief Instigator 

"John D.Wentzky"  writes:

>"Attila"  wrote in message
>news:3ps5031j65h7i11c0bd54jqkue7236kcqm{at}4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 08:54:13 -0400, "John D.Wentzky"
>>  in alt.abortion with message-id
>>  wrote:

>>>"Attila"  wrote in message
>>>news:dmp403d4stjkbb26uairtbs3osftcv4gsp{at}4ax.com...
>>>> On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 00:44:46 -0400, "J Young"

>>>> in alt.abortion with message-id

>>>> wrote:

>>>>>In an apparent challenge to the Supreme Court opinion
Roe v. Wade, on
>>>>>March 20, 2007, Georgia lawmakers introduced the
following Resolution (HR
>>>>>536) to amend the state Constitution: "A
RESOLUTION proposing an
>>>>>amendment to the Constitution so as to provide that the
paramount right
>>>>>to life

>>>> Exactly where can this 'right to life' be found?

>>>In the preamble to the Constitution where it says, "secure
the blessings of
>>>liberty to ourselves and our posterity".  Currently, that
statement is not
>>>being honored in law.

>> I see nothing there about any 'right to life'.

>"ourselves and our posterity".
>You think those people had no right to be alive?

You think that you're an "authority" on law of any kind, which
thought you routinely refute when you reveal your almost non-existent
comprehension of what little you do read.

>>>> Please be specific as I am interested in details such as
exactly how and
>>>> when it applies, how it is enforced and by who, and what are any
>>>> penalties involved.

>>>Patience.
>>>"The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts,
shall hold their
>>>offices during good behaviour," This gives authority to
the people to
>>>remove judges from the bench, if the judges are found out of
good behavior.

...which is more of your distraction from your original delusion, as usual.
Are you that afraid of people recognizing that you're a certified gibbering
loon?

>> Did you even read the question before posting an 'answer'?

>Am i supposed to come up with *all* the details for you so you can present
>it to your bosses?

You're supposed to provide a remotely rational explanation for your
ludicrous claims, for a start.

>Remember, I have copyright protection on my words.

Remember, it doesn't keep anyone else from quoting your insanity without
your permission.

--
   Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick{at}io.com)  Houston, Texas
    chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php  (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
                 LAST GAME:  Houston 2, Manitoba 0 (March 21)
               NEXT GAME: Friday, March 23 vs. Rochester, 7:35

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag