HI Joe,

On Mon 2037-Apr-06 21:20, Joe Bruchis (1:123/789) wrote to Richard Webb:

JB> Richard Webb -> all wrote:

 RW> WAs just sitting here a couple nights ago perusing the March 2009 issue
 RW> of Playboy which had just arrived in my mailbox.
 RW> AS noted, it comes to me free of charge in braille, sans
 RW> pictures and paid advertisements through Library of
 RW> COngress.


JB> Our tax dollars at work? :-)

I've found many good pieces over the years that informed me
about what my government was doing and other things I ought
to be aware of thanks to Playboy magazine over the years
.


 RW> Contrast this with the '70's up through late '80's when I
 RW> probably would have .

JB> It hasn't been the same since Hugh Heffner started needing Viagra! 

DOn't know if that has a lot to do with it, but the Playboy
Interview is a good example.  TOo much vacuous hollyweird
and airhead celebs and not enough of the interviews with
newsmakers and folks you'd really like to get an in depth
look at as they used to do.  TOo much pop culture and not
enough of  the make a man think articles.

Regards,
           Richard
--- timEd 1.10.y2k+