From: No One 

"John D.Wentzky"  writes:

> "No One"  wrote in message
> news:87odmk1zf3.fsf{at}nospam.pacbell.net...
> > "John D.Wentzky"  writes:
> >
> >> "No One"  wrote in message
> >> news:87k5x9iame.fsf{at}nospam.pacbell.net...
> >> > "John D.Wentzky"
 writes:
> >> >
> >> >> "Dionisio"
 wrote in message
> >> >> news:4601f10f$0$16666$4c368faf{at}roadrunner.com...
> >> >> > John D.Wentzky wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>>The rules stated in the Constitution say
that the courts do have
> >> >> >>>the
> >> >> >>>responsibility to decide whether laws
are unconstitutional.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Which would give the USSC authority to
strike down roevwade.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Well, of course it's got the authority. It's
just never seen a good
> >> >> > reason
> >> >> > to do so.
> >> >>
> >> >> Bullshit. You mean the USSC justices don't know the
Constitution?
> >> >> How about that separation of powers clause that the
USSC ignored in
> >> >> 1973
> >> >> because of their own crimes when they tried to cover
their own asses?
> >> >> Two crimes in this case.
> >> >> 1. Illegal abortion
> >> >> 2. Treason against the Constitution of the United
States of America.
> >> >
> >> > Nonsense
> >>
> >> Your opinion of the Constitutional requirements. LOL!
> >>
> >> > - the Supreme Court declared an anti-abortion law illegal in
> >> > Roe versus Wade, but did not perform an abortion (which would be
> >> > illegal for the Supreme Court to do as the court would have to
> >> > practice medicine without a license) and it in no sense committed
> >> > "treason" (unless perhaps you mean installing
King George Bus to rule
> >> > over us in 2000 :-)).
> >>
> >> That is how it is suppoed to be to you?
> >> Weird.
> >> Are you trying to tell me that the AMA has an exclusive right to all
> >> abortion records?
> >> You are the fool if you think that.
> >>
> >> > Talk about delusions on Wentzky's part!
> >
> > Wentzky, you are a complete and utter idiot.  Read what I actually
> > posted 50 times in the perhaps futile hope that it might sink in.
>
> I read it once and knew you were still too ignorant to know the law and use
> it correctly.

Read it again.  With enough practice, maybe some of it will sink in.

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag