From: "Geo." 

"Ad"  wrote in
message news:45ed4790$1{at}w3.nls.net...

> Could be done fairly easily. It's political will wotz missing & the
> reality is that the big boys think everything is kewl with them keep a
> holocaust potential so long as noone else does. That is unsustainable &
> will lead to a large number of nuclear weapon states.

The big boys simply realize that you can't use nuclear weapons except as a
final exit.

>> You don't understand, you can't get rid of nukes without the return of
>> world wars.
>
> Yes you can. Today's conventional weaponry is vastly more destructive than
> it was 60 years ago.

Yeah right, and using it on a large scale would send anyone into bankruptsy.

> I don't believe it is possible to win a world war. You might come out
> unbeaten but not a winner.

I would consider surviving it a win.

> Pick on some small country OK...doable....occupying
> China......nope..equally the PRC occupying The US or Russia or
> India.....nope.

Why china or india, pick some country that has no nukes and say that. For
example canada would be doable.. not that anyone would want it.


Geo. (at least not till global warming kicks in)

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5